This one is stupider than most. I'll hit th elow points; In article <MPG.2018a03fc79adfbb98a141@news.motzarella.org>, 9-11 Facts <911-facts@hotmail.com> wrote: >New theory proves that Zionist Mini Fisson Nukes were used to demolish the WTC. > >Here's your proof! > >Open Letter to Prof. Steven Jones 23 Reasons 4 Fusion >Posted by: 911eyewitness on Friday, July 28, 2006 - 09:00 AM > >All 911 truth seekers appreciate your current contributions toward proving WTC >demolition even though explosives and demolitions are not your field of >expertise. > >However, while I believe that thermate may have been used to initiate the >collapse in conjunction with cutting charges such as RDX, it cannot begin to >explain the observed evidence at the WTC and therefore I feel that we must now >include fusion devices as well in our demolition hypothesis and research. >The significance of this line of research is that while thermate alone could be >blamed on a small group of individuals impossible to identify, fusion devices >can only be supplied by the US and/or Israeli military, according to a Finnish >military expert I have consulted. > >I would appreciate your expert comments, and those of other qualified 911 >scholars, on the hypothesis that directed energy fusion devices were used at >the WTC. > Dumbo, YOu said "proof" up pat top. Not you admit that you have a hypothis. Which is it? >For the benefit of those in this mailing list not familiar with fusion, it is >the nuclear reaction of hydrogen taking place in the sun and does not produce >the same radioactive "fallout" as "fission" reactions with uranium and >plutonium. > >Fusion radiation is short lived, approx. 7-12 hours, can only be detected by >$40,000 instruments, and is contained by the continuous spraying of water. >Telltale byproducts that do not normally occur in nature are Tritium and atomic >size metals, both recorded in official studies and subsequently ignored by >"experts." > >Funding for gradual conversion of the US nuclear arsenal to fusion devices was >recently approved. This would allow the mini-nukes practical use in wars and >troops to control the sites afterward. Official statements said that testing >would not be necessary. I would submit that testing already occurred at the >WTC. > >Evidence of fusion devices at the WTC: > >1. pulverization of 99% of concrete into ultra fine dust as recorded by >official studies. Concrete dust was created instantly throughout the towers >when the fusion device million degree heat rapidly expanded water vapor in the >concrete floors. Or 100,000 tons of 3 inch thick, unreinforced, concrete floor slabs ground up in about 200,000 tons of teel beams. The heat in the pile due to the fires was plenty to dehydrate the concrete and turn it into dust. Hing: Concrete is reoutiely cut woth oxy/Acy tourches. > >2. Superheated steels ablating (vaporizing continuously as they fall) as seen >in video clips of the towers collapsing. This requires uniform temperatures >roughly twice that of thermate. Huh? I didn't see that. Either hasanyone else. > >3. 22 ton outer wall steel sections ejected 200 meters into the winter garden. >Cutting charges cannot provide the energy required. But gravity can. > >4. 330 ton section of outer wall columns ripping off side of tower. Cutting >charges cannot provide energy required. But gravity can. > >5. Molten ponds of steel at the bottom of elevator shafts (WTC1, WTC2, WTC7) >Thermate is impractical for lower level demolition due to the thickness of the >47 steel columns. Nobody can find ANY eyewitness for ANY molten steel. it's all second hand stories or worse. Prove me wrong. Who makes this shit up? There is NO engineer or scientist working in his appropriate area of expertise that thinks that any explosives or thermite/thermate are needed to explain why the WTC towers collapsed or that any explosives were seen. None. Nada. Zip. Squat. Any claim must be text testimony with a URL to a full text transcript. Video need not apply. Edited cites need not apply. The URL must be specific to *that* claim. Don't send me a list of 100 URLS. it just attracts flies. None. Nada. Zip. Squat. -- a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m Harrison for Congress in NY 13CD www.harrison06.com Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001

Is there a tinfoil shortage or something of that nature. There are nuts coming out of the woodwork. IBM

"Mini Fisson Nukes?" What science fiction story did you get that crap from? By posting this absurd DISINFORMATION, you do the 9/11 truth movement far more harm than good - IS THAT YOUR INTENTION? Prepositioned (before the plane impacts) thermate plus high explosive charges were sufficient to bring down all three collapsed buildings, and that is probably what happened. The plane damage will always be arguable as a cause in the case of the towers. However, no plane hit building 7, nor was there nearly enough damage from tower debris or fire to account for its collapse and the manner in which it occurred. The collapse of building 7 is the Achille's heel of the neo-con Homeland terrorist conspirators - their biggest blunder in concealing their mass-murdeous crime against humanity. It is in this alone that clear justification for a new, independent investigation lies.