|
|
Subject: Destroyed WTC Evidence 9-11
From: adykes@panix.com (Al Dykes)
Date: 1/15/2007 1:02:02 PM
In article <qlfnq21pmgjbjc4sk407oa7iu5usphi7li@4ax.com>,
Starfish <Starfish@somewhere.com> wrote:
>
>Destroyed WTC Evidence
>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/destroyed.html
>
>What Became of the Physical Evidence of the
>WTC Attack Ground Zero was sealed off and
>mopped up with astonishing speed. Some
>photographs of it survive in spite of authorities'
>efforts to prevent documentation of the crime
>scene.
>
Lots of unsupprted assertions in the above.
>Virtually none of the physical evidence of the
>horrific crime of the September 11th attack on
>Lower Manhattan survives. Had the towers
>remained standing, much of the evidence of
>the attack's first installment -- the aircraft impacts
Huh? "Virtually none"?
"Some 200 technical expertsout 85 career NIST experts and 125
leading experts from the private sector and academia documents,
interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of
video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of
steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and
sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events
that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers
until they began to collapse."
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
"Survives" is spin. It is true but implies that material was sent to
the smelter with no attempt to examine and keep significant pieces.
Much of the material was examined spooneful by spoonful by fire and
NYFD personel.
Yes, there was a rush to clean up, but you have made an assertion that
we don't know, roughly., how the WTC buildings collapsed.
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Harrison for Congress in NY 13CD www.harrison06.com
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001
Subject: Destroyed WTC Evidence 9-11
From: Freedom Fighter
Date: 1/15/2007 11:26:20 PM
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message
news:eogfiq$6vq$1@panix5.panix.com...
> In article <qlfnq21pmgjbjc4sk407oa7iu5usphi7li@4ax.com>,
> Starfish <Starfish@somewhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>Destroyed WTC Evidence
>>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/destroyed.html
>>
>>What Became of the Physical Evidence of the
>>WTC Attack Ground Zero was sealed off and
>>mopped up with astonishing speed. Some
>>photographs of it survive in spite of authorities'
>>efforts to prevent documentation of the crime
>>scene.
>>
>
> Lots of unsupprted assertions in the above.
>
>>Virtually none of the physical evidence of the
>>horrific crime of the September 11th attack on
>>Lower Manhattan survives. Had the towers
>>remained standing, much of the evidence of
>>the attack's first installment -- the aircraft impacts.
>
> Huh? "Virtually none"?
>
> "Some 200 technical expertsout 85 career NIST experts and 125
> leading experts from the private sector and academia documents,
> interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of
> video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of
> steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and
> sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events
> that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers
> until they began to collapse."
>
> http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
NIST is a government agency. If you believe them, you would have no problem
hiring the fox to guard your henhouse.
> "Survives" is spin. It is true but implies that material was sent to
> the smelter with no attempt to examine and keep significant pieces.
> Much of the material was examined spooneful by spoonful by fire and
> NYFD personel.
>
> Yes, there was a rush to clean up, but you have made an assertion that
> we don't know, roughly., how the WTC buildings collapsed.
--------
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB!
Patriotic Americans must demand that the new Democratic Congress open a new
and independent investigation.
9/11 - the IRREFUTABLE FACTS and the EVIDENCE backing them up:
WTC building 7 collapsed in a deliberate demolition by explosives just hours
after the collapse of the twin towers. There is no other credible
explanation for its collapse. The planes that struck the towers did not
structurally damage building 7, and debris did only minor damage to it. No
steel frame building has EVER collapsed from even a serious fire; the fires
in building 7 were not extensive, and were only on a few of the lower
floors. These probably were arson fires, as falling debris from the towers
would have only ignited the roof and upper floors. Deliberate, pre-planned
explosive demolition is the ONLY explanation for the sudden, complete, and
near free-fall speed collapse of building 7. This is the weakest link in the
official coverup - and the 9/11 Commission whitewash IGNORES building 7
entirely!
See documentation at http://www.wtc7.net/
and http://www.prisonplanet.com/012004watson.html
Explosive demolitions take considerable time to set up (see
http://science.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion1.htm).
The explosives could not possibly have been properly placed around all
thestructural supports and set up for detonation in building 7 in the few
hours between the attacks and that building's collapse. Yet that collapse
was clearly a professionally executed demolition by explosives.
Therefore -
THE DEMOLITION EXPLOSIVES IN BUILDING 7 WERE PUT IN
PLACE PRIOR TO THE PLANES IMPACTING THE TWIN TOWERS!
Therefore -
The 9/11 attacks were KNOWN OF IN ADVANCE, and DELIBERATELY
ALLOWED TO OCCUR! It was intended beforehand that building 7 and the twin
towers all be completely destroyed, KILLING THE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE
REMAINING IN THEM! Is this anything less than mass murder, the crime of the
century aided and abetted if not perpetrated by HOMELAND terrorist traitors
to America?
The above facts, further documented below, do not alone rigorously prove
that previously placed explosives likewise brought down the twin towers, but
see the following:
A paper published by Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics, Brigham Young
University, concludes that prepositioned demolition explosives brought down
all three collapsed WTC buildings, not the plane impacts or fires.
Consider these facts:
1. Pulverization of all three buildings:
As we all saw, all three buildings collapsed to DUST, with unusually little
solid debris remaining. It is clear that a 500,000 ton concrete and steel
building cannot be turned to a huge cloud of dust in less than 15 seconds by
a simple structural collapse, nor indeed by anything other than explosives.
2. Thermate residue in the metal:
Professor Jones of Brigham Young University has tested the metal taken from
the site, and a paper on his findings is available
(http://www.journalof911studies.com/ or video at
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-2842384983834100001&q=stephen+jones
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=...=stephen+jones
The debris has tested positive for products of a THERMATE REACTION. Thermate
is an incediary substance used to very quickly slice through thick steel. It
is used together with high explosives in controlled demolitions.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=WrCWLpRc1yM
Professor Jones's findings have been scrutinized since June 2006 and are
scientifically undisputed. They prove on their own that this was an inside
job, as thermate could not have been present through any other
circumstances.
3. Free fall collapses:
The towers fell, according to the 9/11 Commission, at 9-10 seconds, and 7
for WTC7. This equates to almost free fall speed. The only way an object can
free fall is if it encounters no more resistance in its fall than air. This
cannot happen in a structural collapse, as the floors would pancake on top
of one another, resulting in about 90 major points of inertial resistance to
the fall. Free fall can only happen in a controlled demolition where all the
supports are blown out at once or close to it, and the structures below the
falling matter can offer little or no resistance.
Check out Dutch controlled demolition expert Danny Jowenko's statement on
this:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/3231]http://www.911blogger.com/node/3231
4. Eyewitness reports:
Shortly after 9/11, the FDNY recorded over 500 oral histories in which
firefighters and emergency medical workers recounted their experiences of
that day. Mayor Bloomberg's administration, however, has refused to release
them. But the New York Times, joined by several families of 9/11 victims,
filed suit and, after a long process, the New York Court of Appeals ordered
the city to release the bulk of these oral histories, which it did in August
2005. The Times then made them publicly available
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_
full_01.html
These oral histories contain many dozens of testimonies that speak of
explosions and related phenomena characteristic of controlled demolition.
Some examples:
Several individuals reported that they witnessed an explosion just before
one of the towers collapsed. Battalion Chief John Sudnik said: "we heard . .
. what sounded like a loud explosion and looked up and I saw tower two start
coming down" (NYT, Sudnick, p. 4).
Several people reported multiple explosions. Paramedic Kevin Darnowski said:
"I heard three explosions, and then . . . tower two started to come down"
(NYT, Darnowski, p. 8).
Firefighter Thomas Turilli said, "it almost sounded like bombs going off,
like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight" (NYT, Turilli, p. 4). Craig
Carlsen said that he and other firefighters "heard explosions coming from .
. . the south tower. . . . There were about ten explosions. . . . We then
realized the building started to come down" (NYT, Carlsen, pp. 5-6).
Firefighter Joseph Meola said, "it looked like the building was blowing out
on all four sides. We actually heard the pops" (NYT, Meola, p. 5).
Paramedic Daniel Rivera also mentioned "pops." Asked how he knew that the
south tower was coming down, he said: "It was a frigging noise. At first I
thought it was---do you ever see professional demolition where they set the
charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'? . . .
I thought it was that." (NYT, Rivera, p. 9)
Timothy Burke said that "the building popped, lower than the fire. . . . I
was going oh, my god, there is a secondary device because the way the
building popped. I thought it was an explosion" (NYT, Burke, pp. 8-9).
Firefighter Edward Cachia said: "It actually gave at a lower floor, not the
floor where the plane hit. . . . [W]e originally had thought there was like
an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom,
boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down" (NYT, Cachia, p. 5).
Some of the witnesses spoke of flashes and of phenomena suggestive of
demolition rings:
Assistant Commissioner Stephen Gregory said: "I thought . . . before . . .
No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. . . . I . . . saw a flash
flash flash . . . [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when
they demolish a building?" (NYT, Gregory, pp. 14-16).
Further evidence can be found at:
http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm This
author has a master's degree in Engineering from Stanford University, and a
Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Oregon.
MORE EVIDENCE OF THERMATE-EXPLOSIVE DEMOLITION:
There were severalthousand pounds of still red-hot molten iron found under
the three collapsed WTC buildings six weeks after the cleanup began. When
metal is heated to over 3500 degrees F in a matter of seconds, and a piece
falls away, it is effectively cut just as with an oxy-acetylene torch. This
is how thermate is used to cut through steel from a safe distance.
Demolition crews use it in conjunction with C-4 explosive "kicker" charges.
Initiate the thermite by remote control, wait 12 seconds or so, then
detonate the C-4 to "kick" the column or post away from its severed support.
History can be rewritten, but the laws of physics cannot. Jet fuel can only
reach about 1100 degrees F, nowhere near the temperature required to create
a pool of molten iron slag. That only happens at thermate reaction
temperatures. Thermate is a simple substance, made mostly of aluminum and
iron oxide. When the reaction takes place, the iron oxide and aluminum
become aluminum oxide and white-hot molten iron at a temperature of about
4500 F. Thermate requires at least 1400 degrees F to start its exothermic
reaction, so you cannot ignite thermate by crashing an airplane into a
building. And even if that were possible, how did the thermate get there in
the first place, positioned to sever steel structural members?
EVEN MORE EVIDENCE of the inside job:
Many very small HUMAN BODY FRAGMENTS have been found on the roofs of nearby
buildings. These were too far away to be from jumpers from the towers. If
the towers simply collapsed from damage and fire, what blew these bodies to
smithereens and sent the fragments flying for considerable distances? The
plane impacts did not have the explosive brisance (shattering force)
necessary to do this - only HIGH EXPLOSIVES, like C-4, can blow bodies to
tiny bits.
In addition, consider THE TOTAL FAILURE of our sophisticated NORAD AEROSPACE
DEFENSE SYSTEM. Not even ONE of the FOUR hijacked jets flying at SUBSONIC
speeds towards known terrorist targets was intercepted! Such a failure could
not have happened without it being intentional. Military exercises were
underway at the time that would make reports of hijacked planes appear to be
merely part of the exercise. The attempts at official explanation for this
inexplicable failure have been uniformly ludicrous.
Possible motives? Do a Google search on the "Project For a New American
Century," and the "New Pearl Harbor."
Many deniers of these unprecedented crimes of mass murder are simply
psychologically incapable of considering them possible. Misled by the
corporate/government-controlled media, deceived by an elaborate cover-up,
and indoctrinated with a perverted sense of "patriotism," they are under the
delusion that only barbaric foreign terrorists could commit such inhuman
atrocities. But foreign terrorists could not have planted demolition
explosives in advance. HOMELAND TERRORISTS had to do that! The implications
of this are literally unthinkable to many, which is just what the evil
perpetrators of this crime against humanity are counting on.
Given the shock and horror, the massive death and destruction of these
events, irrational denial is understandable. History reveals despicable acts
of terror by unscrupulous powers in the USSR, Germany, China, and elsewhere.
Why would this evil side of human nature not surface here in America?
Overcoming denial and exposing the truth is the only hope for saving us from
a fascist regime of vicious killers as bad as the Nazis ever were. Should we
wait to find out if they can be even worse?
CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS AND THE SENATE.
DEMAND A NEW AND INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THIS MASS-MURDEROUS CRIME OF
THE CENTURY!
More 9/11 documentation:
http://www.st911.org/
http://www.septembereleventh.org/kc/multimedia/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEJmcvTzYfo&NR
http://911busters.com/911-Commission.html
http://www.septembereleventh.org/audio.php
http://911busters.com/SanFran04/index.html
http://www.911truth.org/index.php?topic=gallery
http://www.reopen911.org/
http://www.911truth.org/
http://www.911truthseekers.org/
http://www.911truthseekers.org/modules/news/
http://www.gnn.tv/
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
http://www.911studies.com/index.html
http://www.septembereleventh.org/index.php
http://infowars.com/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
http://www.mujca.com/index.htm
http://proliberty.com/observer/20051213.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
http://911review.com/
http://guardian.250free.com/wtc/dust-cloud.htm
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2001/t11182001_t1012pm.html
------------------------
The Truth About September 11th
From 23 Informative Websites
Lovearth.net Has Put Together 23 Informative Websites
To Help You Educate Yourself About This "War On Terror"
1) Exposing The NORAD Wag The 911 Window Dressing Tale
Using NORAD's Own Press Release And Fifth Grade Math
Published January 8, 2003 http://www.StandDown.net
2) The Most Comprehensive Minute By Minute Timeline On 911
Published September 9, 2002 http://www.911Timeline.net
3) My Country Right Or Wrong - Questioning September 11th
Published October 22, 2001 http://www.MyCountryRightOrWrong.net
4) More Than 500 Great Articles About 911 From Around The World
Online since September 13, 2001
http://www.AttackOnAmerica.net
5) Tuesday, September 11, 2001, And The Three Top Sins Of The Universe
Published February 9, 2002 http://www.September112001.net
6) Audios, Videos, Photographs, Polls, Petition And News Archive
http://www.9112001.net
7) Bin Laden Family Money & Bush 41 & 43 Conflict Of War Profit
Interest http://www.CarlyleGroup.net
8) The History Of Oil And War - The U. S. And British Oil Imperialism
http://www.OilCompanies.net
9) The Unelected Commander In Thief - Articles, Photos, Books And
Polls http://www.GeorgeWalkerBush.net
10) How The USA PATRIOT Act Subverts 6 Amendments Of The Bill Of
Rights http://www.BillOfRights.net
11) The USA PATRIOT Act Search Law Will Provoke 4th Amendment
Challenge http://www.SneakAndPeek.net
12) Preserving Freedom By Wholesale Abrogation Of Our Civil Liberties?
http://www.Police-State.net
13) How The Fourth Estate Have Become Corporate Lap Dog Stenographers
http://www.FreedomOfThePress.net
14) Book Banning In United States Is Alive And Well In The 21st
Century http://www.Freedom-Of-Speech.net
15) The U.S. Is Unilaterally Violating Numerous International Treaties
http://www.UnitedStatesGovernment.net
16) eMail Addresses Of All 535 Congress Members Plus The V.P. And Bush
http://www.eMailCongress.net
17) Articles On The Perversity Of War And How To Bring Peace On Earth
http://www.PeaceOnEarth.net
18) Ashcroft Covers Up The Spirit Of Justice And Majesty Of Law
Statues http://www.Fascistic.net
19) Why Bush Is Addicted To Perpetual War - Lessons Learned From Daddy
http://www.Orwellian.net
20) Bush's Bay Of Piglets - Many Articles On The Failed Venezuelan
Coup http://www.Imperialist.net
21) Latest EcoHumanePolitical News - Thousands Of Archived Articles
http://www.Earths.net
22) An Extensive Archive Of The Top EcoHumanePolitical Articles
http://www.EarthsNews.net
23) Connecting Through 1000+ EcoHumanePolitical Top Level Websites
With Our New Search Engine You Can Find Thousands Of Archived Articles
http://www.Lovearth.net
"You can fool some of the people all the time,
and those are the ones
you want to concentrate on".
http://en.thinkexist.com/quotes/george_w._bush/
Subject: Destroyed WTC Evidence 9-11
From: adykes@panix.com (Al Dykes)
Date: 1/17/2007 3:03:30 PM
In article <1169063203.035873.4630@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Daniel <sabot120mm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Freedom Fighter wrote:
>
>> Therefore -
>> THE DEMOLITION EXPLOSIVES IN BUILDING 7 WERE PUT IN
>> PLACE PRIOR TO THE PLANES IMPACTING THE TWIN TOWERS!
>
>
>Ok, want to convince me? Answer these simple questions.
>
>1. How much explosives were used?
>2. How many people would it have taken to do all of the pre-demolition
>work?
>3. How long would it take to do ALL of the pre-demolition work on thw
>WTC complex?
>4. When was the pre-demolition work done?
>5. How did the conspirators manage to get all of the heavy eqiupment
>into the complex without anyone noticing?
>6. How much were they paid?
>
And how would you get all that stuff up the freight elevators which
are in tight demand, especially off-hours, and there are *lots* of
other construction people around working on other floors. They expect
to talk shop while waiting for the next car. Union people can get
*very* interested in who strange people are and what they are doing.
How would they get past all the tennent-controlled security and the
24-hour staffed operations which don't let strangers in, let alone do
any construction, without *lots* of planning.
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Harrison for Congress in NY 13CD www.harrison06.com
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001
Subject: Destroyed WTC Evidence 9-11
From: adykes@panix.com (Al Dykes)
Date: 1/19/2007 2:51:33 PM
In article <1169235243.352253.161810@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,
Daniel <sabot120mm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Starfish wrote:
>> On 17 Jan 2007 11:46:43 -0800, "Daniel" <sabot120mm@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Freedom Fighter wrote:
>> >
>> >> Therefore -
>> >> THE DEMOLITION EXPLOSIVES IN BUILDING 7 WERE PUT IN
>> >> PLACE PRIOR TO THE PLANES IMPACTING THE TWIN TOWERS!
>> >
>> >
>> >Ok, want to convince me? Answer these simple questions.
>> >
>> >1. How much explosives were used?
>> >2. How many people would it have taken to do all of the pre-demolition
>> >work?
>> >3. How long would it take to do ALL of the pre-demolition work on thw
>> >WTC complex?
>> >4. When was the pre-demolition work done?
>> >5. How did the conspirators manage to get all of the heavy eqiupment
>> >into the complex without anyone noticing?
>> >6. How much were they paid?
>>
>> These aren't the questions that need to be asked.
>> The questions that need to be asked are what were
>> all these anomalies in the attacks and it's aftermath and
>> how are they explained?
>
>
>No, you dumbshit, these are the questions that need to be answered
>before you can hope to get ONE thinking person to fall for your k00k BS.
>
What "anomalies".
We can't answer them if you can't name them.
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Harrison for Congress in NY 13CD www.harrison06.com
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001
|