Because they attempt to take away CO2 that the plants/trees need, without Oxygen we will suffocate and die. The theory of CO2 trapping the Sun's heat is flaw. The Truth is: Heat got transferred into the atmosphere through the vibration of Oxygen & Nitrogen's Electrons because they touched the hot surface of your car engines, truck engines, airplane engines, power plant's, any heat sources, etc.. Gore's Scientist did the test through "unnatural way" by pumping CO2 into his Green House and accused CO2 of trapping it when his Shelter was the one trapping the heat. We will pay the pay now and later two times. They wanted us to pay CO2 emissions so they can get rid of CO2. Then we will die of no Oxygen. What happened to their logic people? or do they have one? In Belgium, their roads are like a ghost town, not much vehicles on the road. Isn't this sad? How can human hang each other in this civilized age? How can people believe in such CO2 stupidity?

"Wrongway Napolitano" <dont@bother.nul> wrote in message news:pan.2007.03.14.13.11.57.659234@bother.nul... > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:06:51 +0000, Niel Humphreys wrote: > > [snip mind-numbing drivel] > > And you're posting to drug groups because you want somebody to recommend > something to cure your terminal stupidity/insanity? 1.) Tell your Scientists to show "Proof" Not just word or "Theory", or simulation. Show real natural proof that happened! 2.) What you're saying is 0.03% of CO2 is Greater than 99% of (N=78% + O=21%) in the atmosphere. Your math skill is below 1st grade. The Moron shows that he is incompetent to come up with Technical demonstration of his stupid claim. If you failed to come up with the answer, then watch out the public will come to bite you.

"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztezsz.co.uk> wrote in message news:xQ%Jh.12848$Jl.3880@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > "Wrongway Napolitano" <dont@bother.nul> wrote in message > news:pan.2007.03.14.13.11.57.659234@bother.nul... >> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:06:51 +0000, Niel Humphreys wrote: >> >> [snip mind-numbing drivel] >> >> And you're posting to drug groups because you want somebody to recommend >> something to cure your terminal stupidity/insanity? > > 1.) Tell your Scientists to show "Proof" Not just word or "Theory", or > simulation. Show real natural proof that happened! > > 2.) What you're saying is 0.03% of CO2 is Greater than 99% of (N=78% + > O=21%) in the atmosphere. Your math skill is below 1st grade. > > The Moron shows that he is incompetent to come up with Technical > demonstration of his stupid claim. If you failed to come up with the > answer, then watch out the public will come to bite you. > The guy didn't say anything about CO2. I don't know what you are taking but do you see pink butterflies? Please adjust your drugs. Why are you so agressive about this issue? You understood nothing about the green house effect. Something any engineer learns in their first year in college and it has nothing to do with global warning. You think that if we lower our CO2 emissions we will die? We breath Oxygen and not CO2. CO2 is made from Oxygen and if there is more CO2, there is less Oxygen. Maybe YOU are a mutant and breath CO2 and that's why you are so afraid you are going to die. Tell all the guys from your planet to go back home, we don't want them here.

"Daniel Pelchat" <daniel.p@videotron.ca> wrote in message news:o37Kh.145076$1%3.1969606@weber.videotron.net... > You think that if we lower our CO2 emissions we will die? We breath Oxygen > and not CO2. You got your knowledge mixed up, the plants/trees need CO2, and we got Oxygen in return, Currently we don't give much to the plants/tress (0.03% CO2) they gave us Oxygen 21% generously. So for Scientists to take away the low 0.03-0.06% of CO2 would cause a real threat to the plant. Do you need me to illustrate this figure in picture for you? > CO2 is made from Oxygen and if there is more CO2, there is less Oxygen. Hummmm Where are you? from China? or Singerpoor? Niel

"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmapzuztezrzsz.co.uk> wrote in message news:odgKh.127776$_73.90445@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > Only Asswipe understands Asslogic, AssChemistry because someone penetrated > you in the Wrongway and you loved to stick your name to it. You seem to know the subject. Are you talking about you? We don't see the word "Ass" many times in rec.drugs.smart, especially 3 times in the same sentence. At least you proved you had solid arguments against what has been said to you.

"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmapzuztezrzsz.co.uk> wrote in message news:kZ7Kh.12904$tD2.6508@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > You got your knowledge mixed up, the plants/trees need CO2, and we got > Oxygen in return, Currently we don't give much to the plants/tress (0.03% > CO2) they gave us Oxygen 21% generously. So for Scientists to take away > the > low 0.03-0.06% of CO2 would cause a real threat to the plant. Do you need > me to illustrate this figure in picture for you? You seem pretty good to pitch numbers. 03% of what? 21% of what? >> CO2 is made from Oxygen and if there is more CO2, there is less Oxygen. > > Hummmm Where are you? from China? or Singerpoor? What are you talking about? It's like talking with someone who has only half a brain. You only answer what you want with something we can't argue cause we don't know what you are talking about. Since CO2 levels seem to have nothing to do with global warming (according to YOUR scientists) what is the reason for this global warming? Will you tell me that there isn't? You must be blind to not see that. I'm from Canada where the warming is going twice as fast than the average level in the world. I live in the south of the country where the effect is not as drastic but I don't need a thermometer to see there is a problem. We had at least half the snow we used to have this winter and it's not only this year. All animals are migrating to the north and animals living there will have no place to go. And it's not for no reason they always show you polar bears in these documentaries. The thickness of their fat has decreased dramatically cause they have to swim miles to reach the ice field that is smaller every day. You make me think of people who say that there were no holocaust. I would be very interested to see documents from YOUR scientists. Are they called Cheney and Bush?

I wonder how you will react by 2012 of your final hour, “Thank you scientists for putting me back to soil” or will you say “Niel, please come back to save us.”

I wonder how you will react by 2012 of your final hour, “Thank you scientists for putting me back to soil” or will you say “Niel, please come back to save us.”

"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzazozmapzuztezrzsz.co.uk> wrote in message news:bmiKh.10136$PL.5460@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... >I wonder how you will react by 2012 of your final hour, "Thank you > scientists for putting me back to soil" or will you say "Niel, please come > back to save us." Now you really had me. You still answer insanity instead of logic arguments but this one is way out of my league. You think I will die in 2012? And what will kill me? Not enough Oxygen in the air? You think that if we continue like this the emission on CO2 will stop so fast that all plants will die and all Oxygen will disappear from the planet? All this in 5 years? The only thing that will save me is calling you? Are you GOD? If it is really you, we're in BIG trouble. Where do the numbers 0.03% and 21% come from and what do they mean? What causes global warming? Who are YOUR scientists? Did you notice that there is the word "smart" in the name of this newsgroup?

"Daniel Pelchat" <daniel.p@videotron.ca> wrote in message news:QqjKh.3190$wg2.70009@weber.videotron.net... > "Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzazozmapzuztezrzsz.co.uk> wrote in > message news:bmiKh.10136$PL.5460@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... >>I wonder how you will react by 2012 of your final hour, "Thank you >> scientists for putting me back to soil" or will you say "Niel, please >> come >> back to save us." > > Now you really had me. You still answer insanity instead of logic > arguments > but this one is way out of my league. > > You think I will die in 2012? And what will kill me? Not enough Oxygen in Yes, all of us will die (2/3 will be gone by 2012). You missed the title I posted originally. I have another example chemically related that I answered someone else. Maybe that could help you see that Scientists are giving their false analysis, and they will do more harm based on their false figure. "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45FA51D7.9E5E020D@hotmail.com... > bradguth@gmail.com wrote: >> 100% h2o2 (dry powder) > Bwahahaahhaha ! >> is actually quite safe > Hazards > Hydrogen peroxide, either in pure or diluted form, can pose several risks: No kidding, well depending on the percentage of dilution, for example Walmart sells lots of Hydrogen peroxide (3%) for cleaning your cut and bruise. It comes mixed with water. This is an excellent example people should compare and recognize the bogus effect of CO2 to the Global Warning. As you can see 3% of Hydrogen peroxide mixing with water 97% has no ability to kill or destruct anyone because 3% is weak. Similarly 0.03% of CO2 mixing with 99% of O+N in the atmosphere, it too should have no effect on the temperature of O+N. Scientists can use all their fancy words to convince others, but I strongly don't believe it until I see their proof instead of theory. Niel.